Skip to main content

16 posts tagged with "staking"

View All Tags

EIP-8363's gentle transition is already a 16% reward cut

· 4 min read
Aubury Essentian
Ethereum Research

EIP-8363 arrived in the EIPs repository yesterday with a cushion: double the base reward factor at activation, then decay it back to today's value over 18 months. That sounds like a gentle start. At Ethereum's current active effective balance, it is already a 16.0% cut to the net consensus reward curve.

The reason is simple. The proposal doubles gross duty rewards, but it also burns 58.0% of each doubled reward. A fully performing duty nets 84.0% of what the current curve pays.

Rocket Pool's RPL event went one-way after Saturn

· 5 min read
Aubury Essentian
Ethereum Research

Rocket Pool's rpl_staked event looks like it fell off a cliff at exactly the wrong time. The last decoded stake event in mainnet.int_rocketpool_node_event was 2026-02-17 23:20:23 UTC. The first decoded megapools started about 40 minutes later, on Feb 18, and the withdrawal side kept moving for months.

That does not mean "nobody staked RPL after Saturn." It means the old decoded stake-event surface is a bad post-Saturn RPL-staking ledger unless you know what changed.

Withdrawal requests can say zero and still pay out 23,812 ETH

· 4 min read
Aubury Essentian
Ethereum Research

The new withdrawal-request table has a rude little footgun: amount = 0 does not mean "withdraw zero ETH." It means "full exit this validator."

That matters because a naive sum over canonical_beacon_block_execution_request_withdrawal.amount quietly drops the exits. In the May 27 to June 26 mainnet window I checked, those zero-amount full-exit requests showed up as 0 ETH on the request side, while the same validators later produced 23,812 ETH of canonical withdrawals within seven days.

Attestation rewards still know how big the validator is

· 5 min read
Aubury Essentian
Ethereum Research

The last MaxEB committee post had an uncomfortable-looking number: large validators were about 25.6% of active effective stake, but only 0.65% of ordinary attestation committee positions. That sounds like the accounting forgot the stake.

It did not. The committee assignment surface counts validator indices. The reward surface remembers the balance.